To make things confusing, it’s measured across the diameter (or side-to-side) of that circle (for example, 420 feet @ 1000 yards). Vortex made a very significant update to the Viper HD binos in 2018 that increased the FOV, reduced the physical size, and boosted the quality across the board. I like their design and I read praise. Field of view means what it says: it’s how much area can you see in the “circle” of the bino. Make sure they’re comparing the current Viper HP (2019+) to the Monarch 7 (not HG). The Maven B.1 vs C.1 Short Answer The Maven B.1 (left) and C.1 (right) are designed to compete at two different price points. Keep looking. You’ll hear that the Mavens are super crisp glass over and over. They have a phenomenal field of view, slightly better edge to edge clarity, are brighter, and have a better warranty than the Nikons (even if they’re slightly heavier). Looking through the Maven gave the claustrophobic effect of looking through a narrow tube when you compared it side by side with the others (see photos below). The Maven’s showed a much better color contrast between the the green pine boughs and the intertwined blue spruce boughs on the lefts side of the picture. It’s less shaky than 10X and allows for a little better low light ability not to mention better FOV than 10X. I get it that the published specs are what they are, but based on the photo evidence you provided in this review, it appears that the Maven’s are actually zoomed in closer than the Vortex. Compared to a similarly priced set of 12×50 binos made in Eastern Europe, the Maven 10×42 B.1 binoculars seemed to have slightly more chromatic aberration vs the 12×50 comparison binocular. Tell me all about the Zeiss, Vortex, and Meopta at that similar range. Show them to almost anyone and you’re guaranteed to get a “wow, that’s clear”. Is it just the way the camera took the picture? However, that’s the exception, not the rule, so if you’re hard on gear it’s something to factor in. Again, I have not looked through mavens to compare them side by side but this is my take on the vipers for what its worth. You are using an out of date browser. Other stats like interpupillary distance (distance between eyes) and near focus are very similar and don’t matter to the majority of hunters. Only 50% of the lens might stay in focus on cheap binos, which obviously isn’t ideal. Whether that’s a benefit is up to you but it certainly doesn’t hurt. Haven’t compare the 2 and maybe a little different but I had a pair of the 15x50 made in Japan vipers and they were hands down the worst piece of equipment I’ve ever bought. Weight: 1.8 pounds. Not sure why that’s the case, I thought those were taken from the same spot but perhaps not. With Tract, Maven, Burris XTR II, Vortex PST Gen 2, Athlon Ares ETR and a few others, the competition in the $900 to $1400 segment is really heating up. Both the Monarch 7 and Viper HD had great clarity but the Viper seemed to have a slightly larger sweet spot (and less coma, or distortion) in our opinion. I have a set of 8X42 Nikon Monarch 511’s and a pair of Vortex Viper 8X28. I will run them this year and then decide which one's I prefer. No one says that about the Viper. Here’s a quick comparison of the key numbers for each bino so you can take a look at them side by side: I excluded a lot of things from that list that you can take for granted at this price point (all three binos have them): waterproof/fogproof, multicoated lenses, dielectric coatings / phase corrections, rubber armor, adjustable eyecups, and tripod compatibility. Attractive … The Nikons are fantastic binos which is even more impressive considering they’ve been on the market since 2012. After searching for C3 v Viper, I switched my search to just Maven C vs Viper and came across more. The Monarch 7 was 1.6 ounces lighter than the Vortex Vipers which might not seem like much. Winner: Nikon Monarch 7, but only by 1.6 oz. With a FOV of 341 feet @ 1000 yds, it was really clear it wasn’t in the same league as the others. It’s neck and neck for the Monarch 7s and Viper HDs, but when you add everything up the Vortex Viper HD (2018 model) is our winner. Nikon’s warranty only covers manufacturing defects so if it’s your fault, you’ll have to pay. Guns. One option is to go down to a 32mm objective binocular but I’ve found those never have quite enough light for my liking (and the vast majority of hunters agree with me on this one). We tested against Leupold BX-4, vortex viper, Swarovski EL’s, Zeiss conquest, all against the Mavens. Build quality and construction is good. Seems like a few other reviewers say that the sharpness fall off from the center happens earlier on the Viper HD than the Monarch contrary to your observation. I suppose if I have issues with the eye cups, I can look at warranty-ing as Maven has a similar policy to Vortex. Drop them off a cliff, roll over them with your truck, whatever… they’ll get them fixed for you, usually for free. You can usually leave an ID or credit card and they let you do that. To make things easier, there are roughly five categories of binoculars in my opinion: It’s no surprise that these three binos are so popular since they’re the lowest priced HD glass options on the market. I would take a hard look at the Vortex … Josh ended up spending his own hard earned money on the Vipers after comparing the three options for a long time. There's tons of reviews on the higher end Maven … Even the $2800 binos use fluorite “HD” glass, so you’re getting stuff that’s in the same ballpark for a fraction of the price. I have access to quite a few different pairs through a friend who works at Cabelas. While the Nikon Monarch 7s and Vortex Viper HDs have a different MSRP their real world price tends to be very close. Edge to Edge clarity and stunning brightness. Based on my research they are one of the best buys sub $500. In this video we will compare Maven, Vortex, and Redfield Spotting Scopes. Easily could be wrong through, they’re certainly not going to be bad glass given Leupold’s reputation. Again, the 250' FOV on the C3 is weirdly small compared to virtually every other 12x50, so not sure what's up with that, but I'm assuming the glass will be better otherwise compared to anything else in a sub-600 category. There is a 42 mm series with 8x and 10x models as well as a 28 mm series in 7x and … Finally got a good one and I have no complaints. Unfortunately this is where we disqualified the Maven C.1 as an option. It’s time to take a look at these binos side by side and see which is best: To me, this is the single most important comparison between binoculars assuming everything else (clarity, brightness, etc) is similar. The Best Handguns for Big-Game Hunters. To keep it (very) simple, as you magnify light it tends to disperse, or come apart, across the spectrum. The good news is that the relative differences between these three binoculars would be identical i… For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. That difference is why we stopped reviewing the mavens… it was more than enough to disqualify them in my opinion. My wife uses the Monarch 7 now and loves them, even compared to my fancier glass. I assumed the Nikon’s were made in Japan as well but a closer look revealed mine are made in China but the quality is there for the price and they are very light in weight. It was pretty easy to eliminate the Maven’s due to a very narrow field of view compared to the other options. I want to comment that the Maven’s really were not reviewed and shouldn’t have been apart of this article. Oh, and I keep looking to the left because people keep walking down the trail towards me. As for testing binos, I’d always go outside during the last 15 mins of light. I have been looking at the Maven’s, the C.3 12×50’s to be exact vs the Leupold Alpine 12×52’s. See which purchase is best for you! These are $500 binos, and the clarity is amazing. They cost a bit more at around 500 but they have exceptional glass. The C1's glass was a much higher quality than anything from Vortex. The game cam says it’s almost game time... just, 25 days. I own both. As always, YMMV and appreciate you giving it a read Tim! It would appear that the Maven’s magnification is superior…, Hi Garet! ATN Corp. Night and low-light vision optics, when the gadget enthusiasts hear these terms, the first … Let me save you some time. We found the locking diopter ring on the Vortex to be really nice to “set and forget” once you get them adjusted to your eyes. The B2 is a better glass and won't be pushed off the stage by … Maven C series vs Vortex Viper HD. Elk hunting gear: What you actually need and when to buy it, Sometimes it all works out. Once you've considered these standouts, check out the top picks for five other price categories in our complete Audubon Guide to Binoculars. The Vortex Vipers are of course pretty small and on the plus side very handy and get used the most. I’ve read multiple comparisons and the Maven won easily over the Vipers. There’s a thread on this I believe. I bought the C1's this past holidays when they go on sale for $315, the lowest price of the year. HD/ED glass is a fancy marketing term for “extra low dispersion” glass which is usually made with a high concentration of fluorite. I don’t believe either are HD but the ED glass is very clear and bright on both. is a bit cheaper. Some CA is noticeable, more so on the edges but in the sweetspot you have to really look for it. Interestingly, despite the very similar exit pupil and outstanding glass and construction in both sets of binoculars, the Maven … This optic binocular is fantastic and comes with the … Winner: Viper HD, but the monarch was close. The Monarch might be $20-30 cheaper but that’s rounding error at this price point. I understand the specs on all the binoculars and maybe my confusion comes from the way the camera took the pictures for both, but when I look at the photos I see the distance between edge to edge (FOV) for the Mavens is smaller, BUT at the same time in the photo I can see an estimation of 50% higher detail (image appears closer) within that FOV vs the Vortex, why is that? Either way they definitely are true to what it feels like to look through them. They are both 10 by 42's. Thank you for taking the time to respond. Eye cups work well (which is a complaint you hear about with Mavens eye cups not staying up). https://www.chuckhawks.com/meopta_meopro-hd_8x42.html. Biggest 5x5 I’ve eve, September Slowdown! Verified Purchase. That said, if you’re paying an extra $100 to save that weight on your knife it feels pretty stupid to carry it around in your binos. I normally carry them with one of the chest straps that keep them tight to my chest so they don’t bang around and get in the way but are always right there when I need them. It may not display this or other websites correctly. We thought the Monarchs felt best in hand but that was clearly personal preference. Reviewed in Canada on July 3, 2020. For what it’s worth I think the Meotopa brand is worth checking out too, especially the Meopro 8X42 HD. Maven … That's usually a good thing for the … That's because the Vortex Vipers, which took best in class, are so light in comparison to many of the other contenders. Look at a Kowa for … It doesn’t matter if you have a great field of view if most of it is blurry or unclear. Also, Vortex is waterproof and fogproof. Those photos were taken from the same location, and what you’re seeing is the massive difference in FOV (field of view). Looking at bumping up my $50 Amazon binos to the next tier I can justify paying. Since all three binos have HD glass, it would be hard to tell a difference in their crystal clarity at the center of the lens. If we had to put numbers on it, I’d say 75% for the Monarch and 85% for the Vortex. Practically speaking, the extra care used to make those lenses also means you’ll get a much crisper and clearer image. Hi, I'm Baxter Bowman. National Geographic is the product of German manufacturer Bresser and has Field of view 6.5 degrees. Have a different experience or want more info? Independent gear reviews & bowhunting advice. Thanks to my friend Josh, we were able to do a deep dive comparison of the Vortex Viper HD vs Nikon Monarch 7 vs Maven C.1 so you don’t have to wonder which is the best any longer. I went back and forth with this question for about a week and ended up pulling the trigger on some Maven C1's yesterday. Maven build quality was good, but honestly all three were fine and there wasn’t enough of a difference to set them apart. Looking at bumping up my $50 Amazon binos to the next tier I can justify paying. The glass was decent, not quite as good as the viper if you are curious. I'm picking up the maven c1 10x42's for my wife. That’s great peace of mind when you invest this much money in something that is quite literally made of glass. The good news is that the relative differences between these three binoculars would be identical if you compared all three of the 10x versions, so read on. There is nothing more expensive than buying a cheaper option just to go buy the more expensive one later. Lmk if that makes sense. Appreciate the comment. True story: we saw, https://www.chuckhawks.com/meopta_meopro-hd_8x42.html, They function, but are not really suitable for hunting (low light) purposes, Standard glass & construction, work fine but have noticeable limitations, HD glass, 80-90% as good as alpha glass for a fraction of the price, Top quality transmission/brightness without edge to edge clarity, The best money can buy. Any opinions on Athlon Binos? I ran the Viper's for 3 years and had no problem spotting game with it. Maven B1 8x42. Remember, FOV is measured in diameter, so a 400ft+ wide bino has almost twice the viewing area of a standard bino in the low 300s (think pie R squared), which is a massive difference. Dimensions: 6.2 x 5.0 inches. That’s a shame since Maven is a great company but I’m sure they’ll have other versions as they continue to grow. The spectrum of light (esp color temperatures) are very uniform coming from the LED overhead lighting in the store. They’re in the same price range, and I’m curious the comparison between them and the Vipers, I haven’t, but a few buddies have and didn’t think they quite measured up to the Monarch/Viper, which is why we didn’t buy to compare. Just all round a terrible experience. Field of view: 388 feet. About Maven Outdoor Equipment Company Maven is an American company based in Lander, Wyoming who design and create high end binoculars and spotting scopes as well as a good selection of related … Best Lever Gun Cartridge Showdown: The .300 Savage vs. .30/30 Winchester vs. .45/70 . Well, that’s an entirely different (and very long) post but I’ll sum it up as: larger field of view, brightness, and stability (less shaky). Were the pictures taken in the same place? The eyecups were also slightly better quality and made the lenses easier to clean on the Viper as well. Named one of the “10 Best Binoculars of the Year” by Field and Stream and winner of the Outdoor Life “Great Buy Award,” the C.1 is our recommended versatile mid-level optic for hunting, birding, and … If you find a good used pair of the Monarch 7s (or a great deal on a new pair), grab them! The blue and green “popped” much … That said I’m not sure if there is areal distinction as they do have ED quality glass and for sure they are clear and sharp to the eye. Well, that’s an entirely different (and very long) post but I’ll sum it up as: larger field of view, brightness, and stability (less shaky). To clarify: all binoculars were 8x fixed zoom, so it’s not possible to “zoom in”. I think Vortex is the winner. With that background, let’s get into the Vortex Viper HD vs Nikon Monarch 7 vs Maven C.1 review. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Drop me a comment below! Well, they still had the August sale running on the C3s, so I ordered the 12x50 from Maven. These supposedly have the same HD glass as the Razor, but the rest of the binocular (housing, eye cups, etc.) While the Maven C.1 is about $100 cheaper, I really don’t think that makes up for it’s shortcomings vs the other two options. I recently took these Maven binos to compare against a few of the top brands. Joined May 28, 2017 Messages 111 Location New Mexico. That was definitely true with the old version, but I didn’t find it to be true with the new ones (and I own the monarch 7’s, so I’m definitely not biased on that one!). They’re that close to the current Vipers. Just a quick review of the new Maven C.1s and Swarovski SLCs. A slight difference starts to emerge when you look at the “sweet spot” across the lens. Have you had the chance to review Leupold BX-4’s? At less than a foot long, Maven CS.1 15-45x65mm Spotting Scope strikes a great balance between quality, price, and utility. German product is waterproof too. With literally thousands of options from $10-$3500, binos seem pretty confusing to the average hunter. Recently Maven has expanded their binocular line to include a more budget friendly C1 binocular series. I went with the vipers as the field of view is great for a 12x50 at 288 yards. I’ve damaged a pair of Nikons and to their credit they covered it anyway (and repairs didn’t cost that much). I did the research and read.

Dyson Airwrap Attachments Falling Off, Eve Npc Regions, What Is An Index Fossil, Pomegranate Tree For Sale, Home Assistant Water Leak Sensor, Romancing Mister Bridgerton, Bear Alpha Merch, Letter To Girlfriend After Fight, Kathryn Drysdale Husband, H4 Ead Processing Time,